COST CENTRE AND PROJECT DATA
Claimants will be asked to allocate costs to where they should be charged. The aim is to make charging costs to the right place first time as easy and efficient as possible. Claimants will be able to select most frequently used codes from the top of their list and they can search for other cost allocations by the cost centre or project code or by the first word of the cost centre or project name.
To ensure that there are no sensitivities in cost centre or project names, and to provide an opportunity to consider whether they are easy to search on, departments and colleges adopting SAP Concur were sent a list of cost centre names, project short names and sub task names to review.
Key questions they were asked to consider were:
- Which cost centres and projects should be available for charging expenses to?
- Are the names of these cost centres sensitive? If so, rename them to something else because they will be searchable by all who can claim expenses against your cost centres
- Will it be easy for claimants to search based on the first word of the cost centre name? If not, consider renaming so the first name is intuitive for claimants
- Who should sign off this data before it is submitted for inclusion in SAP Concur?
Updates will be possible after SAP Concur goes live and between now and go-live:
It is essential that details of the right people are input into SAP Concur so that claims can flow through the process seamlessly. Departments and colleges adopting SAP Concur will need to undertake the following activities:
- Check that top task managers in Oracle projects are appropriate to undertake the budget-holder review for project expense claims, and provide an alternative if they are not. Budget-holder review is mandatory for project claims. [Project approvers do not mimic the purchasing hierarchy.]
- Provide names of budget-holders for GL (general ledger) cost centre codes, if these are required.
- Advise who will have delegated authority to approve expense claims at each of the levels in the approvals hierarchy as listed below. These are mandatory within SAP Concur.
- Approver level 1 (approval limit of 1 pence): checks and approves all claims before they progress to authorised signatory approval
- Approver level 2 (approval limit of up to £5,000): authorised signatory for claims of up to £5,000, approves claims above £5,000 to progress to next approver
- Approver level 3: authorised signatory for claims of more than £5,000 (up to £10,000)
The approvals hierarchy is managed through the implementation of a “master account” to which named approvers are added as delegates. This allows for more than one approver at each level, to cover absences and so that the task does not always fall to one person. Management of who is asked to approve each claim can be undertaken within SAP Concur using the notifications function, and further instruction on how to do this will be made available in due course.
Updates will be possible after SAP Concur goes live and between now and go live. Further information on the process to follow will be available in due course.
PREPARING YOUR CLAIMANTS
The project team has a communications and training strategy in place but finance and administrative staff within departments and colleges that are adopting SAP Concur can assist claimants as they move to using it for expense claims. Specific activities include:
- Considering who might be a departmental champion to lead engagement with colleagues and act as a point of contact as SAP Concur goes live
- Making use of available communications materials via local channels, for example meetings and newsletters
- Facilitating communications near to and at the go-live date supported by:
- readiness checklist
- go-live materials (for example, paper and electronic posters, getting started guides)